Menu Top



Consumer Protection Act, 2019



Consumer Rights and Redressal Mechanism

Consumer Rights and Redressal Mechanism


Introduction to Consumer Protection Act, 2019

The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (COPRA 2019) is a significant piece of legislation in India that aims to protect the interests of consumers. It replaced the earlier Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Act provides a framework for safeguarding consumers against unfair trade practices, defective goods, deficient services, and other forms of exploitation. It recognises that consumers are often in a weaker bargaining position compared to manufacturers, service providers, and traders, and therefore need special legal protection.


Key Consumer Rights

The Act enshrines several key rights for consumers, which are essential for their empowerment and protection. Section 2(9) defines "consumer rights" as:

These rights form the foundation upon which consumer complaints are built under the Act.


Consumer Redressal Mechanism (Three-Tier System)

The Act establishes a three-tier quasi-judicial mechanism at the District, State, and National levels for the redressal of consumer grievances. A consumer can file a complaint in the appropriate forum depending on the pecuniary value of the goods or services paid for, and the compensation claimed.

1. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (DCDRC): Established at the District level. Handles complaints where the value of goods or services paid for, plus compensation claimed, does not exceed ₹1 Crore.

2. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (SCDRC): Established at the State level. Handles complaints where the value of goods or services paid for, plus compensation claimed, exceeds ₹1 Crore but does not exceed ₹10 Crore. It also hears appeals against the orders of the District Commissions within the State.

3. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): Established at the National level in New Delhi. Handles complaints where the value of goods or services paid for, plus compensation claimed, exceeds ₹10 Crore. It also hears appeals against the orders of the State Commissions and has revisional jurisdiction over State Commission orders.

The Act also provides for filing appeals against the order of the NCDRC to the Supreme Court of India within 30 days.

This three-tier system provides accessible and relatively speedy avenues for consumers to seek justice compared to traditional civil courts. Complaints can often be filed with minimal legal formalities, sometimes even online.


Example 1. Ms. Shalini purchased a television set for ₹55,000 from an electronics store. Within two months, the television developed a major defect and stopped working. The store and manufacturer refused to repair or replace it.

Answer:

Ms. Shalini is a consumer and has the right to seek redressal for defective goods. Since the value of the television is ₹55,000, which is less than ₹1 Crore, she can file a complaint with the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission having jurisdiction over the area where she purchased the TV or where the seller/manufacturer has an office. She would seek remedies like replacement of the TV, refund of the price, and possibly compensation for inconvenience.



Deficiency in Service and Defective Goods

Deficiency in Service and Defective Goods


The core issues addressed by the Consumer Protection Act are problems arising from the purchase of goods and services, specifically concerning their quality and standard. The Act provides specific definitions for goods that are "defective" and services that are "deficient".


Definition of Defect and Deficiency

Defect (in relation to goods): Section 2(11) defines "defect" as any fault, imperfection or shortcoming in the quality, quantity, potency, purity or standard which is required to be maintained by or under any law for the time being in force or under any contract, express or implied, or as is claimed by the trader in any manner whatsoever in relation to any goods.

This includes issues like manufacturing defects, incorrect quantity, substandard quality compared to what was promised or required by law.

Deficiency (in relation to service): Section 2(11) also defines "deficiency" as any fault, imperfection, shortcoming or inadequacy in the quality, nature and manner of performance which is required to be maintained by or under any law for the time being in force or has been undertaken to be performed by a person in pursuance of a contract or otherwise in relation to any service and includes:

This definition is broad and covers a wide range of issues in services, including negligence, delay, failure to perform, and withholding information, if these acts result in loss or injury to the consumer. This link between negligence and deficiency is particularly relevant to tort law.


Consumer as a vulnerable party

Consumer protection legislation is based on the premise that the consumer is often the weaker party in a transaction. This vulnerability arises from several factors:

Recognising this vulnerability, the Consumer Protection Act provides a dedicated framework and simplified procedures to enable consumers to seek redress effectively and efficiently. The inclusion of negligence within the definition of "deficiency in service" directly addresses situations where a service provider's carelessness harms the consumer, allowing the consumer to use the consumer forum route instead of a potentially more arduous civil tort claim.


Example 1. Mr. Ajay gets his car serviced at an authorised service centre. A week later, the car breaks down due to improper fitting of a part during the service. This improper fitting was a result of the mechanic's carelessness.

Answer:

Mr. Ajay received a deficient service. The improper fitting was a fault or imperfection in the manner of performance of the service. Furthermore, it resulted from the mechanic's carelessness, which falls under the definition of negligence. Thus, this constitutes a "deficiency in service" under the Consumer Protection Act. Mr. Ajay can file a complaint with the appropriate Consumer Commission seeking repair of the car, compensation for the breakdown, towing charges, etc.



Consumer Forums and Their Powers

Consumer Forums and Their Powers


Composition and Jurisdiction

As mentioned, the Act establishes a three-tier system of Consumer Commissions. The composition and pecuniary jurisdiction are as follows:

Composition: Each Commission consists of a President and members as prescribed. The President is typically a person who is or has been a Judge of a similar level court (District Judge for DCDRC, High Court Judge for SCDRC, Supreme Court Judge for NCDRC). Members are appointed based on their qualifications and experience.

Pecuniary Jurisdiction (Value of goods/services + compensation claimed):

Commission Jurisdiction Value
District Commission Up to ₹1 Crore
State Commission Exceeding ₹1 Crore up to ₹10 Crore
National Commission Exceeding ₹10 Crore

Territorial Jurisdiction: A complaint can be filed where the cause of action arises, or where the opposite party resides or carries on business, or where the complainant resides or personally works for gain. The 2019 Act introduced the option to file where the consumer resides or personally works for gain, making it more convenient for consumers.


Powers of the Consumer Commissions

The Consumer Commissions have significant powers to grant relief to consumers. If the Commission is satisfied that the goods are defective or the service is deficient, it can issue an order directing the opposite party to do one or more of the following (Section 39):

The commissions have the powers of a Civil Court for certain purposes, such as summoning witnesses, discovering and producing documents, and receiving evidence on affidavits. They can also enforce their own orders.


Example 1 Revisited. Ms. Shalini files a complaint with the District Commission regarding her defective television and seeks replacement and compensation for inconvenience (say, ₹10,000). The total claim value is ₹55,000 (TV price) + ₹10,000 (compensation) = ₹65,000.

Answer:

The District Commission has the pecuniary jurisdiction (₹65,000 is < ₹1 Crore). After hearing the case, if the Commission finds the TV to be defective and the manufacturer/seller liable, it can order the manufacturer or store (the opposite party) to: (a) replace the defective TV with a new one; and (b) pay Ms. Shalini ₹10,000 as compensation for the inconvenience suffered due to the defective product and refusal to rectify the issue; and (c) pay her a certain amount as litigation costs.



Negligence and Deficiency in Service

Negligence and Deficiency in Service


The Link Between Negligence in Tort and Deficiency under COPRA

In traditional tort law, negligence is a distinct tort where a duty of care is owed, that duty is breached, causing foreseeable damage to the plaintiff. A person suffering loss or injury due to the negligence of another can sue for damages in a civil court.

The Consumer Protection Act, 2019, specifically incorporates negligence within the definition of "deficiency" in service. Section 2(11) explicitly states that "deficiency" includes "any act of negligence or omission or commission by such person, which causes loss or injury to the consumer".

This inclusion is highly significant because it provides consumers with an alternative, often more accessible and faster, route to seek redress for harm caused by the negligence of service providers, without having to navigate the complexities of a full-fledged civil suit in tort.


How Negligence Becomes a Consumer Issue

When a service provider (like a doctor, hospital, lawyer, builder, bank, transporter, etc.) provides a service, they owe a duty of care to the consumer. If they fail to exercise the reasonable care and skill expected of a professional or service provider in that field, and this failure (negligence) causes loss or injury to the consumer, the consumer can file a complaint under the Consumer Protection Act alleging "deficiency in service" caused by negligence.

The Consumer Commissions, when entertaining such complaints, effectively apply principles analogous to tort law negligence to determine if there was a deficiency. They examine whether the service provider acted with the required standard of care and skill. If negligence is established and it caused the consumer's loss or injury, the Commission can order compensation.

Examples of negligence constituting deficiency in service:

By categorising negligence in service as a deficiency, the Act allows consumers to leverage the specific machinery and powers of the Consumer Commissions to obtain compensation for harm that would traditionally only be recoverable through a tort claim in a civil court. This significantly enhances consumer protection in the service sector.


Example 2. Ms. Anita underwent surgery at a private hospital. Due to the surgeon's carelessness (negligence), a surgical instrument was left inside her body, requiring further surgery and causing her immense pain and suffering, and additional medical expenses amounting to ₹8,00,000. She also seeks ₹15,00,000 as compensation for pain, suffering, and loss of income.

Answer:

The surgeon's carelessness in leaving the instrument inside Ms. Anita's body constitutes medical negligence. Since this negligence occurred during the provision of a medical "service" by the hospital and surgeon (service providers), it falls squarely within the definition of "deficiency in service" under the Consumer Protection Act, as it is an act of negligence causing loss and injury to the consumer (Ms. Anita). The total claim value is ₹8,00,000 + ₹15,00,000 = ₹23,00,000. As this amount is greater than ₹1 Crore but does not exceed ₹10 Crore, Ms. Anita can file a complaint against the surgeon and the hospital before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The Commission can investigate the medical negligence and, if proven, order the opposite parties to pay the medical expenses and the claimed compensation.